Plot Twist: Wholly Kaw Siero..

D

Deleted member 1881

Guest
After having used this base for many times, about 5-6 I believe with different combos, loading time, and water ratios, I tend to believe this:

It is not a Ferrari, it is a Corvette. I mean, surely is a good soap, but has not lived up the hype for me, personally and with great respect to Sri, who makes good products.

I want to be totally honest with the products I use, cheap or expensive and always give an real thought to the fellow wet shavers.

Let's start with slickness: This soap behaves quite simple; Load enough, load some more and start giving water. Continue giving water, until it is shiny and start shaving. I have to say I'm used to aggressive combos that could take my skin away if I don't pay attention and I tend to overdo it, every time I shave, so take this with a pinch of salt please. The primary slickness is not impressive. It is just good. Having in mind the 25$ I paid (and more) for this, automatically, does not make this one a value buy for me. Other soaps come in my mind, performance based always, that provide really fantastic first pass slickness, no matter what equipment I use. Surely it gets rich, dense and creamy but nothing more.

Stirling is a great example. Costs 13$ and once dialed in, gets really dense and crazy slick, so slick that I couldn't stretch the skin with my other hand. Residual slickness without any additional water on the face. This thing doesn't happen with Siero and I'm really sorry for that. Is Stirling a worse soap that provides 160gr of product and costs 50% less than the "king", which costs 30$ because of the Donkey and the Water Buffalo Milk? Of course not. IF Siero cost 17-19$ it would be a much better value. Now it is not.

A&E is another example. No matter what you do, the lather is so rich and dense that you can't avoid dropping the razor once the soap runs down to your razor handle. You can finish a shave without relather and the razor won't grab your skin anywhere. Price? Not cheap but far from expensive. 18$ was my Asian Plum.

Another one, Barrister's Excelsior. Very very tricky to dial in, but once you add the 1 ton of water it needs, you get something really slick, so slick and protective that makes the 16$ a fantastic value for what you get. I had my doubts about this one, after failing to dial it in, to the point I sent Will a message and asked him what's wrong with this specific base.

Let's go now to the post shave: Ok, here Siero wins. So what? I didn't buy a moisturizer, I bought a shaving soap. I don't want of course the post shave of Arko, but remember how much Siero costs. Stirling's post shave is neutral and tends to dry after some hours without a balm, Excelsior is nothing impressive to write about, gets dry after 2-3 hours. A&E is very similar to WK, and cheaper, so here A&E wins.

In conclusion, why should I buy again this soap base? Just for the post shave? No. I have 50 balms waiting on the counter. I have a L'oreal Men Expert the red one with the Grapeseed Oil and have moisture for 24 hours.

Having this in mind, I won't bother buying any soap that exceeds the 20 euros (including the shipping), if it is from the US. Imagine that I got some Varesino refill for 16 euros in Greece.

Thanks for reading.

ps : Forgot Southern Witchcrafts, 15-17$ for an excellent base, that I have it in my top5.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

GSVwetshave

Forum GOD!
After having used this base for many times, about 5-6 I believe with different combos, loading time, and water ratios, I tend to believe this...
I recently finished my jar of Sierro (Fougere Mania) and I won’t buy it again either too. But for a different reason than RandySp: I was constantly followed by the smell of the base. On my nose, it is a mixture of whey and animal fat, not very strong, but quite obtrusive.
I still have two WK soaps on the previous base - Lav Sublime and La Fougère Parfaite and I really enjoy them in all respects.
 

Boycie83

Space Cadet
After having used this base for many times, about 5-6 I believe with different combos, loading time, and water ratios, I tend to believe this:

It is not a Ferrari, it is a Corvette. I mean, surely is a good soap, but has not lived up the hype for me, personally and with great respect to Sri, who makes good products.

I want to be totally honest with the products I use, cheap or expensive and always give an real thought to the fellow wet shavers.

Let's start with slickness: This soap behaves quite simple; Load enough, load some more and start giving water. Continue giving water, until it is shiny and start shaving. I have to say I'm used to aggressive combos that could take my skin away if I don't pay attention and I tend to overdo it, every time I shave, so take this with a pinch of salt please. The primary slickness is not impressive. It is just good. Having in mind the 25$ I paid (and more) for this, automatically, does not make this one a value buy for me. Other soaps come in my mind, performance based always, that provide really fantastic first pass slickness, no matter what equipment I use. Surely it gets rich, dense and creamy but nothing more.

Stirling is a great example. Costs 13$ and once dialed in, gets really dense and crazy slick, so slick that I couldn't stretch the skin with my other hand. Residual slickness without any additional water on the face. This thing doesn't happen with Siero and I'm really sorry for that. Is Stirling a worse soap that provides 160gr of product and costs 50% less than the "king", which costs 30$ because of the Donkey and the Water Buffalo Milk? Of course not. IF Siero cost 17-19$ it would be a much better value. Now it is not.

A&E is another example. No matter what you do, the lather is so rich and dense that you can't avoid dropping the razor once the soap runs down to your razor handle. You can finish a shave without relather and the razor won't grab your skin anywhere. Price? Not cheap but far from expensive. 18$ was my Asian Plum.

Another one, Barrister's Excelsior. Very very tricky to dial in, but once you add the 1 ton of water it needs, you get something really slick, so slick and protective that makes the 16$ a fantastic value for what you get. I had my doubts about this one, after failing to dial it in, to the point I sent Will a message and asked him what's wrong with this specific base.

Let's go now to the post shave: Ok, here Siero wins. So what? I didn't buy a moisturizer, I bought a shaving soap. I don't want of course the post shave of Arko, but remember how much Siero costs. Stirling's post shave is neutral and tends to dry after some hours without a balm, Excelsior is nothing impressive to write about, gets dry after 2-3 hours. A&E is very similar to WK, and cheaper, so here A&E wins.

In conclusion, why should I buy again this soap base? Just for the post shave? No. I have 50 balms waiting on the counter. I have a L'oreal Men Expert the red one with the Grapeseed Oil and have moisture for 24 hours.

Having this in mind, I won't bother buying any soap that exceeds the 20 euros (including the shipping), if it is from the US. Imagine that I got some Varesino refill for 16 euros in Greece.

Thanks for reading.

ps : Forgot Southern Witchcrafts, 15-17$ for an excellent base, that I have it in my top5.
If you had turned on the charm with with lady in your local shop the other day, you'd have 51 balms on the shelf!
 

HereticHermit

Forum GOD!
I agree that beyond a price point and custom duty, some soaps are saturated at a level. But I will not compare Stirling's with artisan soaps or $22 + value soaps. Premium ingredients and all natural (mostly) scents makes these soaps worth. Every time I start a Stirling's sample my wife gushes how nice they smell but that would be my reaction too if I am not shaving.
OTOH she do not shave and just screws her nose up whenever I open any T&S soap. T&S is scented by amateur artisan but the soap is miles ahead of any Stirling.
Just my opinion though.
 

Fargo

Regular Member
I stopped reading at "After having used this base for many times, about 5-6"... jk

I really don't think you can draw a safe conclusion after so few tries. 5-6 times are not always enough to get to know the complexity of a soap base and its unique traits. And a proof of this is the reports on forums that some found that a sample performed differently than the whole puck, mainly because they didn't have the time to appreciate it correctly. Once they got the full puck because they liked the scent or whatever, it transformed to a glorious performer all of a sudden. The problem is that many shavers, not necessarily you but many, use a different soap every time they shave and expect that each will perform the same with the others without considering that it may need a totally different approach to get the best out of it. Maybe use it another 5-6 times and report back.

And another thing. You mentioned that it didn't live up to your expectations. Maybe your expectations were just very high because you read dozens of reviews before buying it. People are used to exaggerations when they want to express how they enjoy a product. Keep that in mind too. A Corvette is a great performing car too. If you consider the $25 soap a Ferrari, then the twice more expensive SMN is a Bugatti Centodieci? lol
 

TheChrisC

Forum GOD!
Hard to disagree with any of that Randy. I’ve got a GD Kairos soap and while it’s really nice it’s just not worth the price they charge for it. I think there’s a cutoff point where you get affordability and good performance, and beyond that you’re paying a lot for not much more.
 

Rowlers

Massive Member
Staff member
I stopped reading at "After having used this base for many times, about 5-6"... jk

I really don't think you can draw a safe conclusion after so few tries. 5-6 times are not always enough to get to know the complexity of a soap base and its unique traits. And a proof of this is the reports on forums that some found that a sample performed differently than the whole puck, mainly because they didn't have the time to appreciate it correctly. Once they got the full puck because they liked the scent or whatever, it transformed to a glorious performer all of a sudden. The problem is that many shavers, not necessarily you but many, use a different soap every time they shave and expect that each will perform the same with the others without considering that it may need a totally different approach to get the best out of it. Maybe use it another 5-6 times and report back.

And another thing. You mentioned that it didn't live up to your expectations. Maybe your expectations were just very high because you read dozens of reviews before buying it. People are used to exaggerations when they want to express how they enjoy a product. Keep that in mind too. A Corvette is a great performing car too. If you consider the $25 soap a Ferrari, then the twice more expensive SMN is a Bugatti Centodieci? lol
I know if a soap is any good after the first use. If a soap needs any "fannying about" then it is, IMO, shite and to the bin it goes..
 

Fargo

Regular Member
I know if a soap is any good after the first use. If a soap needs any "fannying about" then it is, IMO, shite and to the bin it goes..
I agree that the initial impression is important, but it is just this. It takes time to appreciate an artisan product. What can you do about it. If there were no lathering tutorials, we would have binned far too many soaps. A great lather leads to a wonderful shave most of the times. Fortunately or not, artisan products and complex recipes with rich butters etc. need a different approach than the average soap.
 
D

Deleted member 1881

Guest
I know if a soap is any good after the first use. If a soap needs any "fannying about" then it is, IMO, shite and to the bin it goes..
There is a reason why Lee is a moderator here. Nuff said.
 
D

Deleted member 1881

Guest
Hard to disagree with any of that Randy. I’ve got a GD Kairos soap and while it’s really nice it’s just not worth the price they charge for it. I think there’s a cutoff point where you get affordability and good performance, and beyond that you’re paying a lot for not much more.
^THIS.
 
D

Deleted member 1881

Guest
I just don't do BS @RandySp! I am seriously impressed the the Rasozero and What the Puck soaps I got for $5 ea from IB! They are seriously good.
3.50 € the Rasozero Barbacco in Greece. Will go get one, I love TFS soaps, even the cheaper ones.

I have the older version of Agrumella and the performance is great. Lathers immediately.

I also have the set of Razorock Emperor, so slick and rich.
 

Marcos

Forum GOD!
I agree about a lack of slickness compared to others in the den. I found the same of the tallow donkey formula I had prior to the Siero. I think it’s a great base and I applaud how WK really tries to include great for skin ingredients. I’ve just found with Siero that it just keeps growing and building. It can take on a ton of water. It’s possible my issue just comes from overloading and under hydration but I’ve been cognizant of that. I’m about halfway through my tub I’ll see if it gets replaced or not. It does make my face feel great and skin conditioning and post shave feel are important to me as well.
 

vtmax

Forum GOD!
$29.99US is over priced for WK Siero. Plenty of experience with the base. The slickness is just ok and it does not match some others. A&E Kaizen at under $20US delivered is a superior soap base.

Peter Charkalis has it right with Kaizen. $20 delivered is great customer service. As he says there’s really no need to charge over $20. Kaizen is a top 1-2 soap base right now.
 
Last edited:
Top